Distant metastasis prediction via a multi-feature fusion model in breast cancer

Wenjuan Ma, Xin Wang, Guijun Xu, Zheng Liu, Zhuming Yin, Yao Xu, Haixiao Wu, Vladimir P Baklaushev, Karl Peltzer, Henian Sun, Natalia V Kharchenko, Lisha Qi, Min Mao, Yanbo Li, Peifang Liu, Vladimir P Chekhonin, Chao Zhang

Like Comment

This study aimed to develop a model that fused multiple features (multi-feature fusion model) for predicting metachronous distant metastasis (DM) in breast cancer (BC) based on clinicopathological characteristics and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A nomogram based on clinicopathological features (clinicopathological-feature model) and a nomogram based on the multi-feature fusion model were constructed based on BC patients with DM (n=67) and matched patients (n=134) without DM. DM was diagnosed on average (17.31±13.12) months after diagnosis. The clinicopathological-feature model included seven features: reproductive history, lymph node metastasis, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, CA153, CEA, and endocrine therapy. The multi-feature fusion model included the same features and an additional three MRI features (multiple masses, fat-saturated T2WI signal, and mass size). The multi-feature fusion model was relatively better at predicting DM. The sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy and AUC of the multi-feature fusion model were 0.746 (95% CI: 0.623-0.841), 0.806 (0.727-0.867), 0.786 (0.723-0.841), and 0.854 (0.798-0.911), respectively. Both internal and external validations suggested good generalizability of the multi-feature fusion model to the clinic. The incorporation of MRI factors significantly improved the specificity and sensitivity of the nomogram. The constructed multi-feature fusion nomogram may guide DM screening and the implementation of prophylactic treatment for BC.

Read the full article here: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32989175/ 

Jasmine Walter

Content Editor, Mark Allen Group

94 Contributions
25 Followers
1 Following

No comments yet.